Anonymous asked: How did you lose you virginity?


Answer:

rickymartinofficial:

i had sex

Notes
99766
Posted
33 seconds ago

trickstercronus:

"everyone on tumblr gets offended so easily!" is code word for "why cant i say harmful things without backlash like i usually can offline"

(via galaxys4)

Notes
7232
Posted
4 minutes ago
rayguncourtesan:

trust-me-im-adoctor:

redventure:

juicyjacqulyn:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

hethatcures:

This legitimately upsets me.

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.
So you might end up with more donuts.
But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?
Hrm.
HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.
tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

god i love this site

can’t argue with science. Heretofore, I want my donuts square.

more donut per donut

rayguncourtesan:

trust-me-im-adoctor:

redventure:

juicyjacqulyn:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

hethatcures:

This legitimately upsets me.

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.

So you might end up with more donuts.

But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?

Hrm.

HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.

The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (
R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.


tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

god i love this site

can’t argue with science. Heretofore, I want my donuts square.

more donut per donut

(Source: nimstrz, via grimdarktrolls)

Notes
425903
Posted
7 hours ago

k-elizabeth-t:

This boy at Target asked if I would hold his hand because his ex girlfriend just walked in with a new guy, so naturally I felt bad and held his hand while strolling around Target for a bit. Then it donned on me, with no other couple in sight, that was the best damn pick up line ever pulled.

(via guy)

Notes
540493
Posted
7 hours ago

brynja-storm:

barackfuckingobama:

xinjay:

itsjustafangirlthing:

tundrakatiebean:

spooknessinsalvation:

thisbookofshadows:

barackfuckingobama:

so i bought this ring that has a little hinge and it opens up to a tiny secret box hidden under the gem and my mom told me that women used to put poison in it and then SLIP POISON INTO PEOPLES DRINKS and i was like NUH UH THIS CANT BE REAL and i just googled it and guys this is like a real thing

people are psycho

I have a few of those. I think they’re really neat!

classiest way to poison someone hands down

That’s how it all goes down in Hamlet, poison ring.

I’ve always, always wanted one of these because I have pure peppermint liquid that can ruin a drink with one drop and just kargfksernjskrn I want one.

wait why does everyone want one of these

what are all of you people planning

i regret making this post because i have been getting the creepiest reblogs in the universe seriously tumblr u scary

Fun fact, I have a bracelet that was passed down to me of little gems like these. My great grandmother was a nurse and used it to slip sedatives to uncooperative patients.

(Source: samandriel, via grimdarktrolls)

Notes
77255
Posted
7 hours ago

princessannaofarandelle:

anjeval:

sladinforever:

soldier-of-god2213:

cassjaytuck:

lovedisneylife:

lettingdownhair:

whoo-is-writing:

ask-caramel-pony:

dragonloafs:

armydoctorpeterpotter:

nightmareloki:

numquam-vincar:

crashic:

Behold, the most damaging deleted scene of all time.

The removal of this scene fundamentally alters the relationship Lilo has with Stitch in their early stages, reducing her affection to Stitch to her simply being a nice girl. 

This scene establishes her patience and always blindly optimistic attitude towards Stitch as transference from her parents, contextualizing their entire relationship.

“I needed you.”

As for the sadness of the scene, it is nothing that can’t be found in Fox and Hound, or many of the other Disney Renaissance Film.

If this scene was in the final cut, I would’ve outright CRIED

image

Oh

my

god.

tears

legit

tears

“He was part of our family, you don’t let them die!”

Lilo feels somewhere deep inside, a pang of guilt from what happened to her parents. Be it she forgot to feed Pudge, and he in turn forgot to make it a peaceful day in weather, or simply because she was in the car too. She felt guilty and used Pudge as a type of coping tool to let her know her broken family couldn’t be torn apart any further, even though the stitches were unraveling right before her eyes.

ALL OF MY FEELS

I’m reblogging this for some strange reason… but I somehow feel I have to.  SO glad they kept this out of a movie.  I would have bawled whenever I heard the word “pudge”.

*sobbing* I’m SO glad they didn’t put this in the movie. Pudge dieing? NOOOO!!!

well this hurt a lot

When I saw the epitaph and then the wind blowing the leaves, “mom sent some decorations for us.” I started bawling. Oh my goodness..

asdfghjklakdhdsghdkjhdsfgdsjs Stitch being all sad at the end because he finally understood what he did wrong ;w; And how will Pudge control the weather NOW? I has the sad now :c

brb, crying my head off

no, this isn’t okay, i love this movie so much and what makes it worst is that pudge controlled the weather, which could have saved lilos parents, so it had a significant meaning to her so his death would hurt lilo more than anything

(via thedisneyseries)

Notes
35165
Posted
8 hours ago
TotallyLayouts has Tumblr Themes, Twitter Backgrounds, Facebook Covers, Tumblr Music Player and Tumblr Follower Counter